Fort Lauderdale issues Pension Bonds, adds to its debts

To fully fund its city pensions the Fort Lauderdale City Commission  voted to issue a $340 million pension bond. The Mercatus Center at George Mason University reports that one problem with this plan is the city’s pension plans are underfunded to a far larger extent than the accounting recognizes.  

Using Fort Lauderdale’s 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, the experts at George Mason determined that while Fort Lauderdale’s two pension systems reported an $388 million unfunded liability when using a risk-free discount rate, the total unfunded liability is closer to $1.7 billion.

In 2011, both the General Employees’ plan and the Police and Fire Plan used a discount rate of 7.75 percent to calculate their liabilities. Currently 30 year Treasury bonds are earning under 3 percent. Thus, a great difference between the two unfunded liability calculations.

The City Manager’s rationale for issuing the Pension Obligation Bond is that the city’s pensions will earn better than the 4 percent assumed interest rate on the bond, and thus they will capture the arbitrage benefits. But that is a bet on both the bond market and the stock market, and not a certainty.  

Now the city has effectively put more risk on the balance sheet, all in the service of lessening the pain of rising annual contributions.

The folks at the Mercatus Center don’t mince words on this:

“The pensions remain valued as though they are risky and now the city has effectively put more risk on the balance sheet, all in the service of lessening the pain of rising annual contributions. The POB does not address the structural reasons for rising costs even if it gives the Council a temporary sense of budgetary relief.”
no-bs-ring-44001

What’s behind Seiler’s 4.119? – the High Cost of Low Taxes

On September 10, 2015 one of the highly talented and incisive writers at the  Sun-Sentinel  reported:

“Lauderdale Mayor touts tax rate, ‘strong’ state of city”.

sfl-fort-lauderdale-mayor-says-city-is-strong-video-20150910

It’s true. Fort Lauderdale has maintained a low millage rate for the past few years. Property values have increased handsomely and the Mayor had little to do with that. Still, expenses have been cut in many areas in the City and he did have something to do with that. If you read the Sun-Sentinel, then you know how good things really are in our fair city – or do you?

Since City Manager Lee Feldman arrived, the City has claimed credit to no less than 49 awards and recognitions. This gives the Mayor plenty to brag about. But what’s going on behind the scenes?

How do we get to the 4.119?

City Manager Lee Feldman and Mayor Seiler’s Downtown cronies seem to have their hands full trying to keep the Mayor’s promises.

images-1

We decided to report on some of the background – things the Sun-Sentinel just won’t report. We know, we contacted them over and over again pointing out these pretty concerning issues. Quite possibly, the Publisher is one of those very cronies behind these antics we’ve decided to write about. 

no-bs-ring-44001

 

We’ve published over a dozen stories in the past ten days. We launched a Facebook page last week. Since then, we’ve had over 24,000 views on our page and over 1000 visits to our blog page.

We wrote a story about Lois Frankel’s incestuous relationship with the DDA and how her friend got a no-bid contract with the DDA while she got $11K in campaign contributions.

Fort Lauderdale DDA Awards No-Bid Contract to Congresswoman’s Friends

The story had over 5000 views on our Facebook page. We were honored to see this story picked up by the venerable  Florida Bulldog.

We’ve noticed some other interesting things going on behind the scenes in Fort Lauderdale. For example: The DDA was trying to swap FTA grants worth over $800K to the City for $425K in cash to pay for Lobbying to expand the WAVE Streetcar and to build a new Federal Courthouse.

Fort Lauderdale DDA Tries to Swap Federal Streetscape Grants for Lobbying Cash

Feldman & Seiler: “We’re not engaged in this transaction”

The deal fell apart in October.  While Seiler and Feldman denied any involvement,  we found memos implicating the Director of Transportation and Mobility and two high-ranking staff in this manipulation. Clearly either Seiler and Feldman knew about this, or they should have known. Either way, we are concerned.

images-2

The 4.119 Dream Team

We wrote about a City Audit that found Senior Management at the City’s Department of Sustainable Development involved in “misconduct” and “fraudulent billing”.

Fort Lauderdale Senior Management Involved in “Fraudulent Billing”

Among other things, they were caught illegally pilfering the Building Permit Funds to make intentional overpayments to their staffing vendors. Making this 4.119 dream a reality seems to take some pretty creative thinking.

images-1

We reported on high-level criminal mischief at the City’s Public Works Department. According to a City, the actions by the Director and Assistant Director may have violated  Florida Statutes covering Official Misconduct, Bid Tampering, Unlawful Compensation, and Misuse of Confidential Information.

Report alleges Official Misconduct, Bid Tampering at City of Fort Lauderdale

The Sun-Sentinel did not report on this. Neither did the three Officers of the Court that serve as our Leaders. Prosecution may be warranted in this case……or we can just sweep it under the rug.

In Fort Lauderdale it seems that upholding the law may not be considered as important as keeping up appearances.

imgres

We also reported on a year-long investigation on complaints of discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation in the Public Works.

33 Fort Lauderdale Employees Complain of Hostile Work Environment, Discrimination, & Retaliation

The Investigator wrote:

Recognize that while my investigation was limited to Public Works there is indication of potential concerns in other areas of the City.

no-bs-ring-44001

Stay tuned.

 

 

Fort Lauderdale DDA Tries to Swap Federal Streetscape Grants for Lobbying Cash

Fort Lauderdale DDA wants Northwest CRA Trust Funds to Stay “East of the Railroad Tracks”

Feldman & Seiler: “We’re not engaged in this transaction”

DDA Budget: “The Trend in Net Revenue Continues to be Negative”

 

Fort Lauderdale DDA Spends $264K on Federal Courthouse Lobbying

FRANKEL ANNOUNCES HOUSE COMMITTEE ACTION IN SUPPORT OF NEW FEDERAL COURTHOUSE IN FORT LAUDERDALE

Fort Lauderdale Senior Management Involved in “Fraudulent Billing”

Rapids Water Park Owner Sues Fort Lauderdale Over No-Bid Deal

DDA’s WAVE Two Years Late and $10 million over Budget

Report alleges Official Misconduct, Bid Tampering at City of Fort Lauderdale

33 Fort Lauderdale Employees Complain of Hostile Work Environment, Discrimination, & Retaliation

 

 

33 Fort Lauderdale Employees Complain of Hostile Work Environment, Discrimination, & Retaliation

images-2The City of Fort Lauderdale received a group complaint from 26 Public Works employees last year alleging a hostile work environment, discrimination, and retaliation.

In response, The City Administration obtained the temporary services of an independent third party, Ms. Rosilyn Dickerson, to conduct a fact-finding investigation into these allegations.

During the course of the fact-finding investigation, additional employees joined the complaint, for a total of 33 complainants.

no-bs-ring-44001

Over the fact-finding period, Ms. Dickerson interviewed:

  • twenty seven (27) complainants (six complainants were contacted and chose not to participate in the fact-finding investigation);
  • eleven (11) individuals who either came forward on their own or were identified as having witnessed or having knowledge about certain events; and
  • seven (7) employees in management positions in the Public Works Department who allegedly created the hostile work environment, and/or participated in discriminatory and/or retaliatory actions.

Also during the investigation through the beginning of July 2015, seven (7) Public Works employees within the Engineering Division filed charges with outside parties such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR). These charges include discrimination based on protected classes such as age, gender, race, as well as a hostile work environment or retaliation.

Two of these claims (regarding discrimination based on age) have since been found by the FCHR to be without merit. The rest of the claims are still pending.

14-Jack-Seiler-Susan-Penrod_new

The City’s Consultant Ms Dickerson made numerous observations and recommendations – here are a few excerpts:

Overview Recommendation #1:

City Manager, or his designee, maintains close oversight of any changes and provides consistent messaging departmentally and/or City-wide. The facts reveal a breach of trust at multiple levels of the organization making such close City Manager relationship essential to post mortem success. Subsequent changes or initiatives should be spearheaded by trained professionals (i.e. legal, HR) who would scan the environment for compliance, effectiveness, and risk and act in the best interest of the organization, as an unbiased agent of the City, and not any ancillary factors.

Overview Recommendation #2:

In my professional opinion given the magnitude of this investigation a cursory response may traumatize the organization. Therefore a decisive global action that is made for the good of the organization with no sensitivity to egos, positions, relationships, or territories is recommended.

Overview Recommendation #3:

In addition to standard decisions considered after an investigation, the conglomerate of concerns raised by this investigation warrant consideration of integrative decision making with the sole purpose of working to restore harmony and build trust in the organization. Research supports training as a solution when there is a deficit in knowledge or skill. However when non-compliance, behavior, and or conduct is the problem, training is not always the solution. In the latter the most effective recourse is to remove individuals either from their assigned position, or from the organization entirely.

General Recommendation #8:

Recognize that while my investigation was limited to Public Works there is indication of potential concerns in other areas of the City. Thus the recommendation is to review trends to identify any root cause and whether the origin lies in non-compliance, lack of policy or guidelines, employee performance, supervisor performance, or the organization’s responsiveness to change.

no-bs-ring-44001

 

Recognize that while my investigation was limited to Public Works there is indication of potential concerns in other areas of the City.

Report alleges Official Misconduct, Bid Tampering at City of Fort Lauderdale

The City of Fort Lauderdale has been investigating  misconduct in its Public Works Department.

12250016_10207390484587691_2360970764536123216_n

Fort Lauderdale City Manager Lee Feldman

On January 9, 2015, Mr. Zohrevand registered SES4 LLC, a limited liability company, with the Florida Department of State. His partners in tbis business were Preeti Anand and Faezeh Sarrarn. According to public records, Preeti Anand is the wife of Hardeep Anand, P.E., Public Works Director, and Faezeh Sarram is the wife of Amir Mirmiran, P.E, the principal engineer of Engin-Ovation LLC. Neither Ms. Anand nor Ms. Sarram is a Florida-certified professional engineer.

Hardeep Anand is the Director of the Public Works (PW) Department and hired Mr. Zohrevand as Assistant City Engineer on April 24, 2014. As the department director, Mr. Anand is responsible for signing off on all final employment decisions relating to performance evaluations, merit-based raises, promotions, and other advancements. Mr. Anand also approves contractor invoices and work orders prior to payment by the City.

The evidence gathered to date seems to suggest that. Mr. Pedtam Zohrevand controlled the City’s procurement process so that a bridge repair contract could be awarded to Engin-Ovation even though the City had an existing bridge repair contract with another firm.

Mr. Zohrevand never disclosed that he had a longstanding relationship with the owner(s) of Engin-Ovation when he instructed his subordinates to include Engin-Ovation in the bridge repair RFP. Mr. Zohrevand seemed to have an unusual personal interest in the bidders’ reference and insurance requirements set by the Procurement Division and attempted to have them waived or decreased. When Engin-Ovation submitted its bid, it was not legally permitted to do so in the State of Florida.

no-bs-ring-44001

During the South Gordon/Laguna bridge repair RFP bidding period, Mr. Zohrevand obtained existing City bridge plans (AutoCAD drawings) and those same drawings, with minor changes, were submitted by Engin-Ovation and were represented to be original designs by Engin-Ovation for the South Gordon/Laguna bridges. Engin-Ovation later sent the City an invoice for $17,670 even though it appears that its work consisted of copying plans created by the City.

Hardeep Anand’s role in this bridge repair contract is less clear. Mr. Anand also failed to disclose that that he and/ or his wife incorporated a business with his subordinate, Pedram Zohrevand, and with the owner(s) of Engin-Ovation. By incorporating a business, either directly or through his wife, with his subordinate, Mr. Anand demonstrated questionable judgment since such an arrangement can lead to a frequently recurring conflict of interest between their public roles and private interests.

On May 11, 2015, Mr. Anand recommended that Mr. Zohrevand be promoted from Assistant City Engineer to Assistant Public Works Director even though there were other, better-qualified candidates. Additionally, Mr. Anand recommended that upon promotion, Mr. Zohrevand’s salary be increased by ten percent. The City’s Policy and Standards Manual (PSM) 6.26.2, Establishing Employee Pay Level Upon Promotion, states that promoted employees should receive a five percent increase. It is unclear if Mr. Anand’s recommendation was affected by his (or his wife’s) undisclosed private business partnership with Mr. Zohrevand.

The actions by Mr. Pedram Zohrevand and Mr. Hardeep Anand may have violated  Florida Statutes covering Official Misconduct, Bid Tampering, Unlawful Compensation, and Misuse of Confidential Information.

Further, this investigation has raised serious questions surrounding the legality of proposals and invoices submitted by Engin-Ovation for the work done on the South Gordon/Laguna design plans even though those plans were copied from existing City created plans.

no-bs-ring-44001

DDA’s WAVE Two Years Late and $10 million over Budget

 “It will be ready to ride on

Oct 23, 2018″ – SFRTA

 no-bs-ring-44001

In January of this year DDA Executive Director Chris Wren told the Board that their $142.6 million project schedule was “off a bit” with completion expected in late 2017. In April, the CRA paid $7.5mm up front for construction of the Flagler Loop.C Wren

In June the news got a little more specific – the DDA learned one of the challenges is that they have about a $10 million budget shortfall – a gap between what the projected costs are and the DDA’s budget. The strategy for that shortfall was to offer the Feds a couple of “betterments”.  One such betterment was for the City to do the Flagler Loop which provides $7.5 million more in local funding. The other was a request  from Broward County which brought in $10 million plus or minus in local funding. Then they went back to the Federal Government later in the summer when they submitted a grant application and requested the Feds participate at the $60 million grant level instead of the $50 million originally represented.

At the June meeting Bill Cross, representing South Florida Regional Transit Authority as the DDA’s Project Sponsor gave the DDA Board a project update. Cross told the group they needed to “rebuild some comfort with the Feds” on the project to get them to agree to the $60 million grant. He said they’ve been working with the private utility companies regarding them wanting to get paid for what they believe they are legally obligated to for moving their utilities since it’s in the public right of way and this is a public transportation project. He said this is a risk for the project because the government indicated they will not enter into the grant until the utility agreements are in place.

In June SFRTA Project Sponsor Bill Cross said the schedule had lost 18 months. He projected a 2018 completion date.  

At the DDA  September meeting Mr. Wren told the board there have been a “few hiccups” and financial and utility issues.

At the November meeting SFRTA representative David Vozzolo told the DDA Board:

“it will be ready to ride on Oct 23, 2018”

images

Rapids Water Park Owner Sues Fort Lauderdale Over No-Bid Deal

Fort Lauderdale City Manager Lee Feldman doesn’t seem to like to take advice from others

12250016_10207390484587691_2360970764536123216_n

The Schlitterbahn lawsuit is the latest obstacle in the five-year effort between the city and Schlitterbahn to develop a water park and hotel on a 64-acre site at 5301 Northwest 12th Avenue. The property, located near Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport, includes the closed and rapidly decaying Fort Lauderdale Stadium, that was once the spring training home of the New York Yankees and the Baltimore Orioles.

In its lawsuit, Premier Parks alleges the Schlitterbahn deal has striking similarities to another controversial Feldman negotiatied project involving Recreational Design & Construction. Feldman’s work on that project led to an 2013 investigation by the Broward County Office of the Inspector General. Investigators determined that the Fort Lauderdale violated state law and engaged in misconduct when it awarded Recreational Design & Construction a $32 million contract to build an aquatic complex at the Fort Lauderdale Swimming Hall of Fame.

The OIG’s report states in part:

FinalReportOIG13012

“Although the OIG appreciates the City’s cooperation throughout the investigation, we remain concerned that the City persists in ignoring the explicit requirements of the statute. Thus, the OIG will continue to monitor future solicitations involving design-build projects and work with the City to ensure proper application of the statute.”

The lawsuit says:

“The facts revealed by the [inspector general’s] investigation are strikingly similar to the lack of due diligence and failure to comply with the charter that led to the city’s approval of the lease”

no-bs-ring-44001

 

Feldman on $400 million Bahia Mar Deal: “We did not engage anybody to provide independent business advice”

“We did not engage anybody to provide independent business advice”

images-1

Fort Lauderdale City Manager Lee Feldman

A private developer has proposed a 100 year lease and a $400 million redevelopment of the City-owned Bahia Mar Resort and Marina property on Fort Lauderdale Beach. This latest no-bid developer’s proposal comes after a  failed multi-year attempt by City Manager Lee Feldman to negotiate a similar deal with LXR/Waldorf Astoria.

In his review of the deal proposed at City Commission last Tuesday night, Outside Special Counsel Donald Lunny suggested that the City engage a business consultant to review the terms of the deal.

As Special Counsel,  Donald Lunny gave his advice to the City Commission of the proposed 100 year lease of the City’s prime land: “This is a big deal……I am only saying ….it was an appropriate recommendation under the circumstances”imgres

City Commissioner Dean Trantalis asked City Manager Feldman: “was an independent business judgement sought from a third party”

 

Feldman: “No. …I did not think it was necessary to go through a procurement process and hire a consultant to sit at our side during the negotiations”

City Auditor John Herbst looked at the deal, but offered no business advice. Herbst said:  “I think what we are talking about here, is whether this makes good business sense ……something that is more specific to the operation of a hotel, of a condominium, of a marina. Those types of things I think is really where we are going:   Is this an appropriate, adequate, reasonable rate of return for the property that we hold, and I did not attempt to evaluate that.”no-bs-ring-44001

Fort Lauderdale Senior Management Involved in “Fraudulent Billing”

no-bs-ring-44001“The circumstances surrounding this situation represent a complete breakdown in the “tone at the top”.

imgres-1

A report by Fort Lauderdale City Auditor John Herbst states

“The CAO (City Auditor’s Office) has determined that senior management at DSD (Department of Sustainable Development) engaged in misconduct that included “fraudulent billing”. The Auditor’s report states “Misconduct generally refers to intentional violations of laws, regulations, internal polices, and expectations of ethical business conduct which and employer has a right to expect of its employee. It undermines the public trust and can damage the CIty’s reputation for integrity”. The CAO report goes on to say :“The circumstances surrounding this situation represent a complete breakdown in the “tone at the top”.

DSD management hired numerous temporary staff and compensated them at rates that were far in excess of the rates provided for in the contract.

 

In this investigation, The Auditor reviewed over 2500 emails, sampled time cards and reviewed hours worked and overtime that had been performed. The CAO reviewed the agreements in question and conducted numerous interviews and group meetings with the City Manager’s Office, City Attorney’s Office, as well as Finance and Human Resource.

no-bs-ring-44001

The City Auditor made several “findings”

A finding occurs when there is a violation of an established law, rule, regulation, contract term, policy, or fundamental internal control mechanism. The CAO made the following findings in this case:

  • The official position classification system is being undermined by DSD through the use of “working titles”.
  • DSD did not adhere to billing rates and job descriptions in the temporary service contracts.
  • DSD failed to follow the requirements of Florida Statutes relating to timely payment of vendor invoices by holding onto invoices when they realized they had exceeded the PO, telling Albion that they would  make payment after the new fiscal year began in October.
  • DSD used Building Permit funds for purposes other than included as allowable charges to enforce the Florida Building Code in accordance with Florida Statute 553.80 (7) (a).
  • DSD’s agenda item, CAM 15-1040 dated August 18, 2015 seeking ratification of the overspending and increased budget for additional temporary staffing provided misleading information regarding the reasons for the overspending

One of these findings revealed the City was illegally tapping its State regulated Building Permit Fund for non-eligible expenses:

DSD used Building Permit funds for purposes other than included as allowable charges to enforce the Florida Building Code in accordance with Florida Statute 553.80 (7) (a).

 

The City Auditor was unable to find any emails from the Assistant City Manager responsible for DSD indicating any knowledge/approval of the billing rates and position classifications prior to August 13, 2015, even though the payment problems for temporary staffing began to surface in May 2015. The CAO report says “Failure to use written forms of communication by the Assistance City Manager inhibited transparency and accountability.”

no-bs-ring-44001Assistant City Manager has no emails on this topic

images-2

Seiler Signs Term Limits Ordinance and then Waffles

images-1“we need to have a process and procedure that is fair, transparent and consistent.”

Mayor Seiler says ……

Jonda:

I was very frustrated at the last meeting with the issues that arose involving board and committee service.  As a City Commission, we need to be fair, transparent, and consistent in our handling of board and committee appointments, service, terms, term limits, etc.

In conjunction with our City Attorney, please be sure that our rules, resolutions, ordinances, codes, charter, etc. are all consistent and coordinated.  If we have any unwritten practices, policies or procedures that we have traditionally followed that are not consistent with the specific language of our rules, resolutions, ordinances, codes, charter, etc., please let us know.  If we need to “clean up”, update, or rewrite any rules, resolutions, ordinances, codes, charter, etc., please let us know.  If we need to convene the Charter Review Board to address these issues, please let us know.

The bottom line is that, regardless of the individuals involved, we need to have a process and procedure that is fair, transparent and consistent.

Thanks

       John P. “Jack” SeilerWren

 

Then the Mayor says: There is no process;  it’s totally up to the District Commissioner to decide whether term limits apply or not

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Jack Seiler <Jack.Seiler@fortlauderdale.gov> wrote:

The appointment or reappointment belongs to the District Commissioner.

It is his decision.

Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

——– Original message ——–
From:  <>
Date:12/07/2015 5:20 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Jack Seiler <Jack.Seiler@Fortlauderdale.Gov>
Subject: Re: Advisory Board Term Limits

Respectfully, I am asking you in your role as Mayor to answer on behalf of the City. Rather than ask a person who was not involved in Ms.Phillips appointment, I thought it reasonable to ask you as you voted on her reappointment past her term.
I hope you will reconsider my request for information.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Jack Seiler <Jack.Seiler@fortlauderdale.gov<mailto:Jack.Seiler@fortlauderdale.gov>> wrote:
You should ask the Commissioner who has that appointment.

Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

——– Original message ——–
From: <mailto:>>
Date:12/07/2015 5:00 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Jack Seiler <Jack.Seiler@Fortlauderdale.Gov>
Subject: Re: Advisory Board Term Limits

Hi there again Mayor,
I guess you must be busy. I wrote to you a few days ago and did not get a response.
Can you please help me understand why this person has remained on this Board for over 3 years past her term limits?
I look forward to hearing from you.no-bs-ring-44001

Fort Lauderdale Term Limits Ignored

 

The Fort Lauderdale City Commission Ignores Term LimitsSeiler

In August the Fort Lauderdale City Commission  passed Ordinance C-15-26  which states in part:

(d) Limitation on number of consecutive terms. No person appointed by the city commission to serve on an advisory board, committee, commission or other City board may serve more than six (6) consecutive one-year terms, three (3) consecutive two-year terms, or two (2) consecutive three- or four-year terms on such board. This section shall not apply to appointments to the performing arts center authority, Downtown Development Authority of the City of Fort Lauderdale, General Employees Retirement System, Board of Trustees, Police and Firefighters Retirement System, Board of Trustees, Housing Authority Board of Commissioners of the City of Fort Lauderdale and the Insurance Advisory Board. Board members appointed to the Northwest-Progresso-Flagler Heights Redevelopment Board may serve three (3) consecutive three-year terms on such board.

no-bs-ring-44001

http://www.fortlauderdale.gov/departments/city-clerk-s-office/advisory-boards-committees-applications-and-information

The law says three terms is the limit on the CRA Board and Ella Phillips is serving her fifth term

NORTHWEST PROGRESSO FLAGLER HEIGHTS REDEVELOPMENT BOARD

BOARD DETAILS MEMBER ROSTER
non-specified

Ella Phillips

TERM EXPIRED

Appointing Authority:
DuBose
3 Term:
May 22, 2009 to May 21, 2012

The City Clerk Says:

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Jeff Modarelli <JModarelli@fortlauderdale.gov> wrote:

Good afternoon, Mr. Martin.

Ms. Phillips was reappointed by Resolution No. 09-110, that states, reappointed effective May 22, 2009, for a term expiring May 21, 2012, or until her successor has been appointed. (see attached)

To date, her successor has not been appointed and therefore Ms. Phillips serves until the District Commissioner nominates and the City Commission appoints her replacement.

This allows the board to continue to function during the period of time a replacement is identified.  Board would not be able to function without a quorum.

Jeff

Jeffrey A. Modarelli

City Clerk

City of Fort Lauderdale

100 N. Andrews Ave.

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

954-828-5010

jmodarelli@fortlauderdale.gov

 

And Mayor Seiler said:images

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Jack Seiler <Jack.Seiler@fortlauderdale.gov> wrote:

You should ask the Commissioner who has that appointment.

Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

——– Original message ——–

Date:12/07/2015 5:00 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Jack Seiler <Jack.Seiler@Fortlauderdale.Gov>
Subject: Re: Advisory Board Term Limits

Hi there again Mayor,
I guess you must be busy. I wrote to you a few days ago and did not get a response.
Can you please help me understand why this person has remained on this Board for over 3 years past her term limits?
I look forward to hearing from you.

Is the Mayor upholding the law, or working around it?no-bs-ring-44001